Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Date
Msg-id 2622731.1602186212@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation  ("Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>)
Responses Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
>> I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
>> seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
>> Have you tested this output back to 9.5?

> I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10.

The patch assumes that parallel query is enabled, which is not true by
default before v10, so it should certainly not be applied before v10
(at least not without significant revisions).

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Expansion of our checks for connection-loss errors
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation