Re: fork/exec - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: fork/exec
Date
Msg-id 26218.1075684294@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fork/exec  (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes:
> Nice. Could perhaps also get it to do the ugly and oft repeated
> setitimer(ITIMER_PROF, &prof_itimer, NULL) and beos_backend_startup() bits,
> which currently contribute greatly in making the post-fork code unclear.

Good point.

> Flip you for it? :-)

Go for it, I've got plenty on my plate already ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Q: How ORDER BY is being done inetrnally?
Next
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: fork/exec