Re: plperl fails with perl 5.28 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: plperl fails with perl 5.28
Date
Msg-id 26187.1527030029@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl fails with perl 5.28  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Well diagnosed. Maybe it's worth pointing out that almost all the 
> examples of perl_run() in the perlembed manual simply ignore the 
> returned value. OTOH, if that's what we're supposed to do why isn't the 
> function declared that way?

Yeah, it seems that mainly what they're doing is trying to resolve
the confusion about that.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl fails with perl 5.28
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works