Re: Extensions, this time with a patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date
Msg-id 26138.1287585101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions, this time with a patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
>> In v6 patch, should client_min_messages or log_min_messages be lower
>> than WARNING, they get set to WARNING for the script install context. We
>> still dump the extension's script at each WARNING, but you can set your
>> client_min_messages (and log_min_messages) to ERROR before hand.

> I would vote for overriding client_min_messages but not log_min_messages.

Why?  The problem with unreasonably bulky messages is just as
objectionable for the log.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die