Re: Auto-updated fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Auto-updated fields
Date
Msg-id 26080.1210221698@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto-updated fields  (Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>)
Responses Re: Auto-updated fields
List pgsql-hackers
Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de> writes:
> I may be wrong but my feeling is, not to much weirdness in the core
> please :)

+1 ... we have wasted more than enough man-hours trying to get the magic
"serial" type to play nicely.  If I had it to do over, we'd never have
put that in at all.  The underlying mechanisms are perfectly good ---
it's the idea that the user shouldn't need to know what they're doing
that causes problems.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tino Wildenhain
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto-updated fields
Next
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches