Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
Date
Msg-id 26060.1529030294@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
List pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 15 June 2018 at 02:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think that if possible, we should still allow a partitioned table
>> in which all the rels are temp tables of the current session.  What we
>> have to disallow is (a) temp/permanent mixes and (b) temp tables from
>> different sessions.

> So, this used to work in v10. Is it fine to just pluck the feature out
> of the v11 release and assume nobody cares?

IIUC, it worked in v10 only for small values of "work".

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Ideriha, Takeshi"
Date:
Subject: RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: ntile() throws ERROR when hashagg is false