Re: We do not need pg_promote_v4_to_v6_addr/mask - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: We do not need pg_promote_v4_to_v6_addr/mask
Date
Msg-id 26038.1424141206@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We do not need pg_promote_v4_to_v6_addr/mask  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 02/16/2015 09:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, a bit of digging in the git logs and mail archives says that the code
>> in question was originally added in 7.4 (commit 3c9bb8886df7d56a), in
>> response to this discussion:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/200309012156.05874.t.maekitalo@epgmbh.de

> Wow, talk about a walk down memory lane.

Tell me about it ;-).  I was entirely astonished to discover that the
original author of the promote_v4_to_v6 code was moi.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Expanding the use of FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER for declarations like foo[1]
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments