Re: [HACKERS] Hash Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jesper Pedersen
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Hash Indexes
Date
Msg-id 25b3631c-ae24-dbdd-cbca-a3f8bd31eceb@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Hash Indexes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/11/2016 11:37 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> With above fixes, the test ran successfully for more than a day.
>>
> There was a small typo in the previous patch which is fixed in
> attached.  I don't think it will impact the test results if you have
> already started the test with the previous patch, but if not, then it
> is better to test with attached.
>

A mix work load (INSERT, DELETE and VACUUM primarily) is successful here 
too using _v2.

Thanks !

Best regards, Jesper




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)",File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6