Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Date
Msg-id 25ae8759-5f76-ccc1-0fc4-ac86330717c9@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/11/17 5:27 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The main area of "design doubt" remains the implementation of the
> recovery_target parameter set. Are we happy with the user interface
> choices in the patch, given the understanding that the situation was
> more comple than at first thought?

Could you summarize the current proposal(s)?

Personally, I don't immediately see the need to change anything from the
parameter names that I currently see in recovery.conf.sample.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issueswith combined queries
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] many copies of atooid() and oid_cmp()