Re: wal_sender_delay is still required? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?
Date
Msg-id 25969.1291648101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to wal_sender_delay is still required?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> Walsender doesn't need the periodic wakeups anymore, thanks to
> the latch feature. So wal_sender_delay is basically useless now.
> How about dropping wal_sender_delay or increasing the default
> value?

If we don't need it, we should remove it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggesting a libpq addition