Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
Date
Msg-id 25927.1139456806@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
Responses Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com> writes:
> It would have been nice to have an option to SQL's VACUUM that would
> ignore the cost-based delays so as to bring that database back
> to life as rapidly as possible.  (Likewise the vacuumdb shell
> command.)

What's wrong with SET?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Silas Justiniano"
Date:
Subject: What's faster?
Next
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: What's faster?