Re: AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well
Date
Msg-id 25886.1153319903@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well  (Gregory Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> One possible criticism is that a user that manually does BEGIN; CLUSTER
> DATABASE; ROLLBACK; won't be warned that the cluster will not be undoable.

s/possible criticism/deal-breaker/ ... you can't possibly think that the
above would be acceptable.  It'd be worse than "won't be undoable"; it'd
probably corrupt your database.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress bar updates
Next
From: Joshua Reich
Date:
Subject: Patch process?