Re: perltidy version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: perltidy version
Date
Msg-id 25852.1520002421@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: perltidy version  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: perltidy version  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> In that case, we should at least update our instructions for how to install
>> it. But that's definitely a better option than hosting our own copy.

> But surely the idea of updating the version to use should be considered
> further?  Maybe they have even improved the output ;-)  Has anyone
> looked?

+1.  We're not that far away from it being time to run pgindent/perltidy,
so now would be a good time to consider whether we like a newer version's
result better.

If we do decide to stick on the old version, then yes, improve the
pointer.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: perltidy version