Right,
I replace the table alias irq to instreq and the function works.
I don't know what could have been the problem: is irq a reserved word, or
it's because the table alias has the same name then the function name.
Thanks for pointing me to the right direction.
SWK
SunWuKung wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I use it as a table alias inside the function.
>
> Select ..........
> irq.instreq_min_metcount,
> irq.ref_deptype,
> irq.instreq_aggrfunc
> From .................. instrument_requirement irq ON ........
>
>
>
>
> Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 11 October 2009 2:20:32 pm SunWuKung wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have a plpgsql function called irq(IN ulist integer[], .....)
>>> It works fine on 8.1 Linux
>>>
>>> On 8.4 on windows XP running the function gives an error message
>>> (Undefined
>>> column: 7 ERROR: record "rec" has no field "instreq_id") wich is strange
>>> because the underlying query does return that column.
>>> I run the create script of irq to create irq2 - and irq2 works fine.
>>> I delete irq and rename irq2 to irq and I get the error back.
>>>
>>> The error is consistent in the sense that if I delete the database and
>>> restore it it appears again the same way.
>>>
>>> Is this a bug?
>>> Any suggestion what I should be doing with this?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help.
>>> SWK
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25847709.html
>>> Sent
>>> from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> Are you using the string 'irq' inside the function?
>>
>> --
>> Adrian Klaver
>> aklaver@comcast.net
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25847955.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
