Re: WAL log performance/efficiency question - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WAL log performance/efficiency question
Date
Msg-id 25796.1179413752@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL log performance/efficiency question  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Keaton Adams wrote:
>> We are running on PostgreSQL 8.1.4 and are planning to move to 8.3 when
>> it becomes available.  Are there space utilization/performance
>> improvements in WAL logging in the upcoming release?

> One big change in 8.3 is that COPY on a table that's been created or
> truncated in the same transaction doesn't need to write WAL at all, if
> WAL archiving isn't enabled.

There are a couple of improvements in tuple storage (the header is
shorter, and short varlena fields have less overhead); those would
translate pretty directly into less WAL space too.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL log performance/efficiency question
Next
From: Keaton Adams
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL log performance/efficiency question