Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date
Msg-id 25773.1390930930@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Honestly, I would prefer that we push a patch that has been thoroughly
> reviewed and in which we have more confidence, so that we can push
> without a GUC.  This means mark in CF as needs-review, then some other
> developer reviews it and marks it as ready-for-committer.

FWIW, that was the point I was trying to make as well ;-)
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe