Re: pg_regress multibyte -> encoding? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_regress multibyte -> encoding?
Date
Msg-id 25764.1302731633@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_regress multibyte -> encoding?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> pg_regress supports a --multibyte option, which can also be invoked
> using the MULTIBYTE make variable when you run make check.  I think this
> is fairly unknown, but we are now documenting it as part of how to run
> the collation regression tests.  I think it would also be useful in the
> PL/Python regression tests for some of the unicode test variants.

> So before this spreads too widely, should we rename it to --encoding and
> ENCODING to be consistent with the naming everywhere else?

+1

> Does anyone use the old interface?  Do we need to keep it?

As long as this is only in HEAD and not back-patched, I don't see a need
for that.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: GEQO-induced crash with provably dummy relations
Next
From: Brar Piening
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows build issues