Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Date
Msg-id 25760.1258328298@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Nov 15, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree with Heikki that it would be better not to commit as long as
>> any clear showstoppers remain unresolved.

> If ever there were an argument for topic branches, *this is it*.

How so?  They've got a perfectly good topic branch, ie, the external
git repository they're already working in.  If the branch were within
core CVS it would accomplish exactly nothing more as far as easing the
eventual merge.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Next
From: Emmanuel Cecchet
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning option for COPY