Re: Improvements in pg_dump/pg_restore toc format and performances - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pierre Ducroquet
Subject Re: Improvements in pg_dump/pg_restore toc format and performances
Date
Msg-id 2575263.Lt9SDvczpP@peanuts2
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improvements in pg_dump/pg_restore toc format and performances  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improvements in pg_dump/pg_restore toc format and performances
Re: Improvements in pg_dump/pg_restore toc format and performances
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday, September 18, 2023 11:54:42 PM CEST Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 02:52:47PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:51:11AM +0200, Pierre Ducroquet wrote:
> >> I ended up writing several patches that shaved some time for pg_restore
> >> -l,
> >> and reduced the toc.dat size.
> > 
> > I've only just started taking a look at these patches, and I intend to do
> > a
> > more thorough review in the hopefully-not-too-distant future.
> 
> Since cfbot is failing on some pg_upgrade and pg_dump tests, I've set this
> to waiting-on-author.

Attached updated patches fix this regression, I'm sorry I missed that.


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Move bki file pre-processing from initdb to bootstrap