Re: alternative back-end block formats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: alternative back-end block formats
Date
Msg-id 25710.1390930798@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: alternative back-end block formats  (Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: alternative back-end block formats  (Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com> writes:
>> There are a couple of really huge issues that would have to be argued out
>> before any progress could be made.

> Is this something that people want to spend time on right now?  As I
> mentioned earlier, I'm game.  But it doesn't sound like I'll get very far
> without adult supervision.

TBH, I'd rather we waited till the commitfest is over.  This is certainly
material for 9.5, if not even further out, so there's no pressing need for
a debate right now; and we have plenty of stuff we do need to deal with
right now.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c