Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans
Date
Msg-id 25683.1533136820@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Looking at it, this sounds suspiciously something where we could just
> test EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD, based on the comments for that flag, but I
> wouldn't be willing to bet very much on me being right about that.
> Can somebody try to fetch backward even if this flag wasn't provided?

They're not supposed to, and it would be a bug of theirs not yours
if they did.  Other node types that rely on eflags being provided
honestly generally just Assert that they're not asked for something
else later.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Cynthia Shang
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow COPY's 'text' format to output a header
Next
From: Marco van Eck
Date:
Subject: Re: Have an encrypted pgpass file