Re: Feature: temporary materialized views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Date
Msg-id 25631deb-cd4c-57dd-85c8-5d8c20296618@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feature: temporary materialized views  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Feature: temporary materialized views  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/6/19 10:18 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is a patch to do that and close the gap.  With that, we will
> be able to check for inconsistencies better when working on the
> follow-up patches.  What do you think?

I approve. I was when testing this stuff that I found the IF NOT EXISTS 
issue.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring IndexPath representation of index conditions
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: PG_RE_THROW is mandatory (was Re: jsonpath)