Re: NaNs in numeric_power (was Re: Postgres 11 release notes) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: NaNs in numeric_power (was Re: Postgres 11 release notes)
Date
Msg-id 25568.1526570565@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: NaNs in numeric_power (was Re: Postgres 11 release notes)  (Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com> writes:
> Thank you. The patch looks fine to me.
> Also, I have done the "make check" in Windows and Linux environment with no problem.

Pushed, thanks for reviewing/testing.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in get_partition_dispatch_recurse
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] amcanbackward is not checked before building backward index paths