Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Date
Msg-id 25554.1059605890@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgsql-patches
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
> I recoded the stuff as Tom recommended, leaving the non-pretty version
> function names as they used to be, inventing new pg_get_XXXX_ext
> functions for the extended stuff, and pushing the code down into
> pg_get_XXXX_worker functions when needed. We now need the additional
> prototype include patch from builtins.h.

Applied with some editorializing.  In particular, I don't believe the
original did the right thing with (a - (b - c)).

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?
Next
From: Sean Chittenden
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?