Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Date
Msg-id 25400.1568074405@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:04 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Adding to CF.

> Rebased.  An OID clashed so re-roll the dice.  Also spotted a typo.

FWIW, I'd move *all* the OIDs added by this patch up to >= 8000.
I don't feel a strong need to fill in the gaps in the low-numbered
OIDs, and people who do try that are likely to hit problems of the
sort you just did.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Next
From: Nikita Glukhov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters