Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
Date
Msg-id 25400.1128630311@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?  (Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>)
List pgsql-performance
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> Are we awfully worried about people still using 2.0 kernels? And it
> would replace two calls with three in the worst case, we currently
> lseek before every read.

That's utterly false.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?