Re: PLUGINS Functionlity in Win32 build scripts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PLUGINS Functionlity in Win32 build scripts
Date
Msg-id 25302.1229632999@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PLUGINS Functionlity in Win32 build scripts  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PLUGINS Functionlity in Win32 build scripts  (MUHAMMAD ASIF <anaeem.it@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi�:
>> This is actually in direct contradiction to the original intent of the
>> plugins/ subdirectory, which was that it only contain libraries that the
>> local administrator had decided to consider safe and put there manually.

> I think this is fantasy -- the plpgsql debugger already has a makefile
> that writes the files directly to the plugins subdir.

Well, so are we to take one violation of a security policy as meaning
we should encourage more?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PLUGINS Functionlity in Win32 build scripts
Next
From: Marc Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to eliminate duplicate b64 code from pgcrypto