"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane said:
>> This seems awfully limiting; isn't return_next a better API?
> plperl already does return_next for handing data back to postgres (see
> recently applied patch). I don't understand how we can use it when fetching
> data from postgres into plperl, which is what Abhijit is working on.
Oh, I see --- I thought this was duplicating return_next. Sorry for
the noise.
regards, tom lane
