Re: Request for replication advice - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Request for replication advice
Date
Msg-id 25246.1163189270@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Request for replication advice  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Request for replication advice  (Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>)
List pgsql-general
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> So, my question for the list is: is Slony + log shipping the direction
> I should be investigating, or is there something else out that I ought
> to consider?

Those are two different methods: you'd use one or the other, not both.

Slony-I is much the more battle-tested of the two at the moment.  In
theory WAL log shipping should be higher performance for heavy-update
scenarios, but its latency is variable (low update rate = higher
latency), and not easy to put a bound on pre-8.2.

Have you looked at the replication info recently added to the PG docs?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/failover.html

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Brad Nicholson
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for replication advice
Next
From: Brad Nicholson
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for replication advice