Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Date
Msg-id 2524029.1622436267@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster  ("Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql@mailpen.com>)
Responses Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
List pgsql-performance
"Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql@mailpen.com> writes:
> I thought that having a "USING" clause, was semantically equivalent to 
> an "ON" clause with the equalities explicitly stated.  So no, I didn't 
> try that.

USING is not that, or at least not only that ... read the manual.

I'm wondering if what you saw is some side-effect of the aliasing
that USING does.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)"
Date:
Subject: Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Next
From: "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)"
Date:
Subject: Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster