Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags?
Date
Msg-id 25209.1496774737@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handlerflags?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handlerflags?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> A reasonable rule would actually be to only use [u]int32 and
> sig_atomic_t, never bool.

Yes, I'd agree with that.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths