Re: ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 25209.1106427442@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ARC patent  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu> writes:
> I have a couple aquaintances at IBM that I can try to contact about it.  
> Rather than assume what IBM will do, why not just ask them?  If they 
> don't respond, they don't respond.  If they do respond, it's better than 
> us guessing.

People seem to be assuming that asking IBM is a zero-risk thing.  It's not.
If they are forced to deal with the issue, they might well feel that
they have to take action that we'd not like; whereas as long as it's not
officially in front of them, they can pretend to ignore us.

This is not a whole lot different from our situation today: now that the
issue of the pending patent is officially in front of us, we have to
deal with it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autotuning Group Commit