Re: Global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id 251A02BE-A148-4FEF-90EB-5E9559310B8E@dunslane.net
Whole thread
In response to Re: Global temporary tables  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Global temporary tables
Re: Global temporary tables
List pgsql-hackers

> On Jun 22, 2026, at 4:57 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 at 23:06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>
>> Wow, we're on the same track. I have a patch series for exactly this
>> feature that I was about to submit.
>>
>> FTR here's where I'm at. I'll try to take a look at yours ASAP.
>
> Oh, wow. There's a lot of similarity between our patchsets, which is
> reassuring, but there are also a number of differences, which I need
> to think about in more detail.

Yeah, agree on both fronts. The main areas I see are the catalog and handling wraparound. I don’t think there’s
necessarilya clear winner on either, so I’ll be interested to hear what others say. 

Cheers

Andrew





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Akshay Joshi
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query