Re: search_path vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: search_path vs extensions
Date
Msg-id 25183.1243538181@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: search_path vs extensions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: search_path vs extensions  (Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: search_path vs extensions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> It also seems to me that we're getting seriously sidetracked from the
> dependency-tracking part of this project which seems to me to be a
> much deeper and more fundamental issue.

I thought that part was a pretty simple problem, actually.  Have an
object representing the module, make sure each component object in the
module has an AUTO dependency link to that object.  Where's the
difficulty?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: early casting in plpgsql
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions