Re: Pg_dump options - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dmitry Alyabyev
Subject Re: Pg_dump options
Date
Msg-id 25143348242.20020129114557@al.org.ua
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pg_dump options  (Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@range.infoplease.com>)
Responses Re: Pg_dump options  (Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@range.infoplease.com>)
List pgsql-general
Yes, you're right. But why do not make it like --user and
--read-password-from-stdin-without-promtp options ?

--
Dimitry


Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 11:16:21 AM, Karl DeBisschop wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 03:27, Gurudutt wrote:
>> Hello Dmitry,
>>
>> Yes!! I fully agree with what you say, the option should've been there
>> in pg_dump just the way it is in mysql_dump.

> IIRC, it has been discussed, but was rejected because passing a password
> on a command line cannot generally be made secure.

> Responding to a propmt can. A variety of other methods can. But command
> lines are sniffable in many (most? all?) environments.

> --
> Karl


> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karl DeBisschop
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg_dump options
Next
From: Ben Ausden
Date:
Subject: Re: numeric SORT order