Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date
Msg-id 25128.1514568804@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have looked at 0002 and 0003. Those look good to ship for me.

> Yeah, I'd vote to push those right away to see what buildfarm has to
> say.  That way you can push 0001 shortly after the dust settles (if
> any), which will have an effect on the bootstrap data format patch.

Yeah, I think all of this is at the point where the next thing to do
is see what the buildfarm has to say.  I could test it manually on
prairiedog, but I'd just as soon let the buildfarm script do the work.

It does make sense, probably, to push 0001-0003 first and see if
anything turns up from that, then 0004.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types