Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory
Date
Msg-id 2512.1177641496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Where are we on this?

Still trying to think of a less messy solution...

>> What it essentially says is that trying to clean up shared-memory
>> state in a PG_TRY block is unsafe: you can't be certain you'll
>> get to do it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] A crash and subsequent recovery of the master can cause the slave to get out-of-sync
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory