Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)
Date
Msg-id 25105.1276096102@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yes, that was considered and rejected, IIRC.  What is your definition
>> of equality for xml?

> I'd vote for !memcmp().

Surely not.  xml is not text.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN