Re: Foreign key referential action timing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Foreign key referential action timing
Date
Msg-id 25095.1098394596@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Foreign key referential action timing  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> writes:
>     While not exactly what the spec invisions, I believe we can come
> closer to the correct behavior by treating all of the referential actions
> as non-deferrable while allowing deferment of NO ACTION and the check
> itself.

Since no one seems to have objected, I've applied this patch.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: plans for bitmap indexes?
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: code question: storing INTO relation