Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_class -> reltuples? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_class -> reltuples?
Date
Msg-id 25059.1015548874@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_class -> reltuples?  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Responses Re: pg_class -> reltuples?  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> I have no problem making restrictions on data types for portability, but
> at least we should be consistent:

We *are* consistent.  int8 is not used in the system catalogs, and where
it is used, the system will continue to function if it's implemented as
a 32-bit datatype.  (At least, things still worked the last time I tried
turning off HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT.  If someone broke it since then, it
needs to be fixed.)
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Point in time recovery: recreating relation files
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence