Re: Sort Refinement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Sort Refinement
Date
Msg-id 25058.1206050882@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sort Refinement  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Sort Refinement  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Currently, our sort algorithm assumes that its input is unsorted. So if
> your data is sorted on (a) and you would like it to be sorted on (a,b)
> then we need to perform the full sort of (a,b).

Simon, would it be too much to ask that you concentrate on reviewing
existing patches during commit fest?  Trying to get people to think
about random new ideas is about the most direct undermining of the
commit-fest concept that I can think of.  Save 'em for later.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[]
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds]