Re: BUG #19036: Failed prepared INSERT statement make another SELECT query generate wrong result - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #19036: Failed prepared INSERT statement make another SELECT query generate wrong result
Date
Msg-id 2504804.1756519592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #19036: Failed prepared INSERT statement make another SELECT query generate wrong result  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #19036: Failed prepared INSERT statement make another SELECT query generate wrong result
List pgsql-bugs
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Friday, August 29, 2025, ZhangChi <798604270@qq.com> wrote:
>> I still have a problem with this. When an INSERT fails, why not undo all
>> the effects of the INSERT?

> Performance.

Yeah.  You can certainly argue that it was a design error to make
nextval() nontransactional, but the performance advantages are
compelling.  Most critically, if we required that, then any
transaction doing nextval() would block all other transactions from
doing nextval() on the same sequence: they'd have to wait to see if
the first one committed before they could know what value to use.
(Deadlocks between nextval's on different sequences could be a problem
as well.)  So the odds that we'd change that are nil, even if there
weren't a few decades worth of backwards compatibility to worry about.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19036: Failed prepared INSERT statement make another SELECT query generate wrong result
Next
From: "ZhangChi"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19036: Failed prepared INSERT statement make another SELECT query generate wrong result