Re: Partitioning and constraint exclusion - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Partitioning and constraint exclusion
Date
Msg-id 25017.1308673519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Partitioning and constraint exclusion  (Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@abstraction.fr>)
Responses Re: Partitioning and constraint exclusion
List pgsql-general
Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@abstraction.fr> writes:
> On Postgres 9.1beta2 when i run this code the first select will use
> contraint exclusion but the second will not.
> This apparently has something to do with the size of the array
> returned by the fake immutable function.

See predtest.c:

/*
 * Proof attempts involving large arrays in ScalarArrayOpExpr nodes are
 * likely to require O(N^2) time, and more often than not fail anyway.
 * So we set an arbitrary limit on the number of array elements that
 * we will allow to be treated as an AND or OR clause.
 * XXX is it worth exposing this as a GUC knob?
 */
#define MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE        100

While you could possibly increase that, I think that your approach is
bound to have terrible performance anyway.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LISTEN filtering
Next
From: Cédric Villemain
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4.8 bringing my website down every evening