Re: could recovery_target_timeline=latest be the default in standbymode? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: could recovery_target_timeline=latest be the default in standbymode?
Date
Msg-id 249bd41d-0385-3038-4394-a42f00e1a045@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: could recovery_target_timeline=latest be the default in standbymode?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: could recovery_target_timeline=latest be the default in standbymode?
List pgsql-hackers
On 22/12/2018 00:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:54:20PM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
>> I am +1 for recovery_target_timeline=latest by default. This is
>> common case in my opinion.
> 
> I agree also that switching to the latest timeline should be the
> default.  People get confused because of the current default.

How about this patch then?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL partition tables use more private memory
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full