Re: 7.4 COPY BINARY Format Change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 7.4 COPY BINARY Format Change
Date
Msg-id 24988.1060004641@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.4 COPY BINARY Format Change  (Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>)
Responses Re: 7.4 COPY BINARY Format Change
List pgsql-hackers
Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk> writes:
> However, is COPY BINARY meant/designed to be used as transfer or
> backup mechanism?

I think you're overlooking a key consideration: COPY BINARY is not
an isolated feature anymore.  By design it uses the same data
representations as are used for binary query parameters and results
in the rest of the 7.4 FE/BE protocol.

I could see some value in providing byte-swapping routines in libpq
to convert between local and network representations for integers and
floats.  The underlying facilities (ntohl etc) are readily available,
of course, but it's a small matter that is easy to get wrong.

I'm not sure it's worth packaging up COPY BINARY logic per se.  I think
you'd end up with an API not materially simpler than dealing with the
format directly.  And I'm unconvinced it'd actually be used widely,
whereas I do expect binary transfer of individual values to be common.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: "truncate all"?