Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys
Date
Msg-id 24982.1212970335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> and i'm sure no one is against that idea, but you're never going to be able to 
> match the performance of just avoiding the check. 

We'll never be able to match the performance of not having transactions,
either, but the community has never for a moment considered having a
"no transactions" mode.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq support for arrays and composites
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: handling TOAST tables in autovacuum