Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 17:56:41 Tom Lane wrote:
>> The other thing that I would say is a non-negotiable minimum requirement
>> is that the patch include the necessary configure pushups so it does not
>> break machines without uintptr_t.
> There is AC_TYPE_UINTPTR_T, so that should be easy.
It's certainly do-able, the point is just to do it.
regards, tom lane
