Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I'm actually kind of wondering what the INFO elog level is good for,
>> as this is just about the only use and it seems wrong.)
> +1 for one less logging level.
I rememebered what INFO is for: it's the elevel that VACUUM VERBOSE
uses to ensure that its output gets seen at the client. (I missed
that in my first grep because vacuum's elog/ereport calls don't use
INFO as a hard-wired elevel.) So we probably can't get rid of it.
But that makes it even more clear IMHO that EmitWarningsOnPlaceholders
shouldn't be using it. It's not intended for error/warning types of
uses, but for verbose logging.
regards, tom lane
