Re: Syntax for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Syntax for partitioning
Date
Msg-id 24863.1256942671@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syntax for partitioning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> IMO, the real problem is that the type interface is poorly
> encapsulated.  There's way too much code that knows about the internal
> details of a type - namely, that it's a 32-bit integer modified by a
> second 32-bit integer.  I think there are still places where the code
> doesn't even know about typmod.  If we're going to go to the trouble
> of changing anything, I think it should probably involve inserting an
> abstraction layer that will make future extensions easier.  But I have
> a feeling that's going to be a tough sell.

Yup, you're right.  It would be an enormous amount of work and break a
lot of third-party code, for largely hypothetical future benefits.
We've got better places to invest our limited manpower.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
Next
From: Alexey Klyukin
Date:
Subject: PL/Perl backed crashed during spi_exec_query