Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup
Date
Msg-id 24832.1045941723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup
Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup
List pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> In my testing with PL/R, it reduces the first call to a PL/R function
> (after connecting) from almost 2 seconds, down to about 8 ms.

Hm, pretty significant.  Can you measure any per-fork cost (ie, the loss
incurred by children that don't use PL/R)?  Is there any measurable
benefit for our other PLs (plperl etc)?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup